Applications pile up faster than they are read
The first sift happens on the job title and on instinct. The good profiles go through with the rest.
Sifting, acknowledging, pre-screening and replying to candidates repeat with every vacancy. The agent takes them on and gives you back the time for interviews.
The first sift happens on the job title and on instinct. The good profiles go through with the rest.
Silence is the most common answer in the trade, and the one that damages an employer brand most.
The same five questions, on the phone, one at a time, for a fortnight.
Three slots offered, two refused, one candidate lost on the way.
I applied ten days ago for the technician job and I have heard nothing. Also, I wanted to know what the salary is.
Your application arrived on the 3rd and the team is reviewing it. On pay, the advert gives a range and I cannot go beyond what is published. I am passing your question to the recruiter, who will reply within two working days.
The stop line I negotiate nothing, and I quote no figure that is not in the advert.
Without it, nobody knows where a candidate stands.
No application left without a reply.
The criteria are written before the sift, and shown after it.
The same five questions, without spending the week on them.
One slot, two messages, settled.
The rejection is written, and it is sent.
A hiring decision is never taken by an agent.
The process holds from application to answer.
An agent that claims to do everything ends up promising what you cannot deliver. Here is what it refuses, and what it hands over.
Access is read-only wherever possible. Any action that writes into your tools goes through a rule you have approved.
Describe your situation in a few lines. We tell you plainly whether an agent makes sense for you, and what it would take to put one in place.